When
good guys are jailed for stepping out of line
Sat 19th March 2005 | Sue Webster
What
happens if you're a soldier and you oppose a controversial war?
In Britain, conscientious objection is an option. The reservist
George Solomou has emerged as a self-professed 'beacon' for those
within the Army who opposed the war in Iraq. Similarly Rose Gentle,
the Scottish mother of a soldier killed in Iraq last year, has
called on British troops to become conscientious objectors and
refuse to serve in Iraq. As with the McCartneys in Belfast or
the Deepcut families, personal stands and families speaking out
can be a potent political force.
I am British but my American husband is a professional soldier in the US army,
whose career is in tatters because he took a stand against war in Iraq. For
daring to oppose a war that Kofi Annan and others have declared illegal, he
has been court martialled, stripped of his sergeant's rank, imprisoned for
14 months and now stands to lose his pension and carry the stain of convicted
'felon'. What does it say about the American military machine that it needs
to lock up even the 'good guys' if they dare to step out of line?
Up until last year my husband Abdullah William Webster had had a distinguished
military career stretching back to 1985. Abdullah fought in the first Gulf
War and saw a close friend killed. In the 1990s he went on to perform difficult
peacekeeping duties in Bosnia and Kosovo. He was raised a Christian and converted
to Islam in the mid-1990s. His faith has always been important to him but so
has the army. He is not a pacifist and believes that the military performs
a valuable and noble duty. He has always taken great price in his professionalism.
But Iraq was a different story.
My husband consulted his conscience, his family and Muslim clerics. He had
decided that he couldn't be part of an illegal war. In September 2003 he applied
for recognition as a conscientious objector. His unit then was based in Germany,
and likely to be mobilised. Abdullah was told to withdraw his application:
senior officers said it would not succeed and, in any case, no stark choice
between country and conscience would be forced on him. That was untrue. Later,
with his unit due to deploy to Iraq, Abdullah was suddenly ordered to ready
himself. Not for the first time he attempted to reach a solution by asking
to be reassigned to non-combat duties. This was rejected and instead the army
set out to make an example of my husband with a court martial. Despite Abdullah's
service record the army sought a long prison sentence.
Abdullah's court martial turned my world upside down. An abiding memory I have
is of him being led off back to his cell in Mannheim as I watched in tears,
holding our 22-month-old daughter in my arms. I have now not seen Abdullah
for over six months. After detention in Germany he was transferred to Fort
Lewis, in Washington State. For the first two months at Fort Lewis he was not
even able to contact me.
I'm a teacher and have had to return to full-time work back in Britain, meaning
I'm away from my infant daughter for nearly 50 hours a week. Our daughter has
become more clingy, dependent and less happy. And what am I to tell her? Your
father's in prison, but he's a good man? In the midst of this ordeal there
has been new strength in solidarity.
Amnesty
International has adopted Abdullah as a prisoner of conscience and has called
for his release and restoration of his rank and privileges. Why has the army
picked on my husband? The Pentagon said at the end of last year that it had
received around 100 conscientious objection applications and had approved half
of them. But it appears to be singling out those who specify they object to
the Iraq war on particular grounds, especially issues of legality. Just like
Tony Blair who still faces probing questions over the legal advice he received
over war in Iraq, it seems the US authorities cannot bear to have this matter
publicly questioned. My husband's is a reluctant campaign forced on him by
a vindictive military system apparently unable to brook principled opposition
to a controversial war.
In Britain Abdullah would at least be accorded the respect that people have
shown to George Solomou and Rose Gentle. Far from being a deserter or a coward,
Abdullah is a brave man with principles.
Today, on the second anniversary of the invasion of Iraq we should remember
the thousands of Iraqi victims. But we should also keep in our thoughts those
soldiers sent to fight a war they never believed in. We in Britain should also
know that opposing a controversial war apparently makes you a criminal in America.
Is this the kind of ally we really want in the 'war on terror'?
Top
From
Charlotte Wildgoose (Military wife of British Soldier)
Thu, 17 Mar 2005
Hello,
In December last year I was fortunate enough to travel to the USA on holiday,
with my husband, following his tour in Iraq. We travelled to Los Angeles and
spent the day in Santa Monica. Whilst there we happened accross the most emotional
and fantastic display of peaceful anti war protesting.
We
spent valuable time chatting with the organisers, who also happened
to be war veterans and ex military personnel. My husband talked of
his time in Iraq as a member of the British Forces and his overwhelming
emotion at seeing the time and effort they had made with their display,
which bought home the true cost of war on the families of American
service men and women.
The memorial display has been happening every Sunday since February 2004. Volunteers
arrive at about 8am and methodically plant white crosses in rows, in the sand.
Each cross represents an American soldier who has lost his/her life in this illegal
war. After the crosses are planted, they set out a flag-draped coffin with an
empty pair of combat boots in front and a helmet on top. The numbers on a sign
are updated to show the number of service men/women killed and wounded. The display
called 'Arlington West' is arranged by the Los Angeles branch of the Veterans
For Peace organisation.
Each
week the number of crosses grow and already a couple of acres of
beach are used. You hear the figures, but it's only when you see
the crosses the reality and enormity seizes you. Add to those crosses
the numbers lost from other countries and you can only imagine how
much of the beach could be covered.
I have enlosed pictures that I have taken of the memorial display.
Offering my continued support,
Charlotte Wildgoose (Military wife of British Soldier)
Website:
http://groups.msn.com/FamiliesofUKForcesinIraq
Top
'They
can't train you for the reality of Iraq. You can't have a mass grave
with dogs eating the people in it'
Two years after the war began, a growing number
of US troops are refusing to return to Iraq
Suzanne Goldenberg in Fort Stewart, Georgia
Saturday March 19, 2005 |
The Guardian
At the same time that Kevin Benderman's unit was called up
for a second tour in Iraq with the Third Infantry Division, two soldiers tried
to kill themselves and another had a relative shoot him in the leg. Seventeen
went awol or ran off to Canada, and Sergeant Benderman, whose family has sent
a son to every war since the American revolution, defied his genes and nine years
of military training and followed his conscience.
As the division packed its gear to leave Fort Stewart, Sgt Benderman applied
for a discharge as a conscientious objector - an act seen as a betrayal by many
in a military unit considered the heart of the US army, the "Walking Pride
of Uncle Sam"..More>>
Top
From War Resisters Support Campaign
in Canada
24.01.05
Dear Military Families Against the War
On behalf of the War Resisters Support Campaign in Canada, I am writing to offer
solidarity and friendship.
During the Vietnam War, Canada welcomed over 50,000 war resisters - both draft
dodgers and deserters - who came here to avoid participating in an unjust, atrocious
war.
Our Campaign is calling on all Canadians to urge our Government to welcome those
who are resisting the current war in Iraq. We now have six war resisters with
us here, including Jeremy Hinzman, who recently faced his hearing for refugee
status. We expect a decision on his refugee claim by early March. The other resisters
left the military either just before being sent to Iraq, or after having served
there. We are proud to be able to offer them our support and to assist them as
best we can in settling in their new country.
Our work includes a petition drive which has gathered over 20,000 signatures
in Canada, the US and elsewhere, arranging events at which the war resisters
can speak out, and lobbying the Government to renew the tradition upheld in the
60's and 70's, of welcoming US war resisters
to Canada.
We look forward to any common efforts we may undertake in solidarity with you
and all others who support those who resist the war.
In Solidarity,
Lee Zaslofsky
Vietnam War Deserter
War Resisters Support Campaign
Top
George
Solomou: Why I'll refuse to fight in this immoral war
Every individual soldier has the moral right to decide
whether he will put his
life on the line
The Independent | 21 January 2005
Earlier this week, I came out publicly against the war in Iraq. I'm not the only
member of the Labour Party to be opposed to our military participation in this
American-led adventure, nor am I the only soldier. In fact, there is a growing
vocal minority within the Territorial Army that is against the war. Nonetheless
I am the first one to make it clear, in public, that if called to serve in Iraq,
I will refuse. This has not been a decision arrived at impulsively. I have never
believed in the rightness of this war; in fact I was on the big anti-war March
in February 2003. Even then - before the absence of the weapons of mass destruction
that Prime Minister Blair and President Bush cited as the principal reason to
rush to war was admitted by all - I was astounded that they could take us to
war when it was clear the majority of the population was opposed. Members of
the Labour Party at the time were talking about practicing an "ethical foreign
policy", and yet there was nothing ethical about the way this was being planned
and sold to the public...More>>
Top
Rose
Gentle, mother of Gordon who died in action in Iraq, visited a young
Iraqi war victim last week in a Manchester Hospital. Aysha Saleem lost 8 members
of her family when a Coalition shell hit her families house in Fallujah in October.
Four year old Aysha is recovering well from wounds to her ankle and shoulder.
Rose Gentle brought the little girl a big bundle of presents which were very
gratefully received. Rose's visit to Aysha in Withenshawe Hospital received widespread
coverage in the local press (see below).
Saved
by the love of a stranger
Manchester Evening News
Friday, 3rd December 2004
Picture:Dave Thompson
Little Aysha Saleem plays with her dead mother's jewellery
in a Manchester hospital - a world away from the violence in Iraq which claimed
the lives of most of her family. A necklace and ear-rings are her only reminder
of her mum Atika, who was killed when their home was destroyed during an American
bombing raid in Fallujah...More>>
Top
Defend the 343rd! Sign the petition in
support of the 343rd Quartermaster soldiers who refused to follow dangerous orders
at: www.campusantiwar.net
Army Gears Up to Punish Soldiers Who Refused
Mission
Statement in Support of the 343rd Soldiers Who Refused Iraq Mission
Issued by the Campus Antiwar Network Coordinating Committee
- 21 November 2004
"The Army doesn't want the information to get out."
Beverly Dobbs, mother of Spec. Joseph Dobbs
Well, we want the information to get out. We want everyone to know what the military
is trying to do to these soldiers who stood up against unsafe orders. They were
right to refuse, and no charges should be brought against them.
The Army has recommended punishment for 24 members of the South Carolina-based
343rd quartermaster company who refused orders to drive a fuel convoy on a route
hundreds of miles long without armor, air or ground support, and carrying helicopter
fuel they believed to be contaminated, and therefore dangerous to other soldiers...More>>
Top
Military
Family Life Comes Under Study
Kimberly Hefling | Associated Press Writer | 19.11.04
WEST LAFAYETTE, Ind. (AP) - The military, so the saying goes, enlists a soldier
but re-enlists a family. Getting families to re-up in time of war, however, is
a daunting task the defense department hopes will be made easier with research
by Purdue University.
``Today, more than ever, we don't go to war without the support of our families,''
said Lt. Col. Joe Richard, a Pentagon spokesman.
Purdue's Military Family Research Institute is getting $8 million in federal
funds to study soldiers and their families. The idea is for policy makers to
use the findings to keep soldiers from leaving.
From better housing to financial incentives to postwar counseling, Richard said
officials recognize they have to keep soldiers and families happy if they are
to maintain troop strength in an all-volunteer military.
When established in 2000, the five-year project focused on military families
in peacetime. The fight against terrorism and war in Iraq obviously changed that...More>>
Top
Blair's
legal case for war was sexed up too
John Kampfner | The Times online | 21.11.04
When a prime minister commits men and women to die
in the service of their nation, he carries a responsibility to demonstrate
not only judgment but also honesty. The controversy surrounding Tony
Blair and Iraq has focused on the dossier produced in September 2002
that misrepresented the threat posed by Saddam Hussein°s weapons of mass
destruction. That has been a distraction. More important is what happened
from January 2003 until war in March. Central to this is the legality
of the war, a matter not, as some government loyalists assert, an obsession
of leftist journalists and MPs but something that exercises the pillars
of the Establishment...More>>
Top
From
MelloYello
email message received 25.11.04
I am a veteran of the U.S. army. I served in a millitary
hospital during operation desert storm. It was very difficult seeing
disfigured soldiers. There are people that say there really weren't that
many soldiers killed or wounded. A lot of us were affected. I can only
imagine what these poor guys are going through now. It was a lot easier
for me to see dead bodies than it was for me to see soldiers with limbs
blown off. Dead bodies don't scream.
The war for hearts and minds has been lost. We must admit the folly of our mistakes.
We went to war under the pretext of freeing the people of Iraq. We must face
the truth that we were deceived about the weapons of mass destruction. Since
there are no weapons of mass destruction we need to bring our soldiers home.
It is sheer foolishness to rebuild a country that will undoubtedly be hostile
to our countries in the future.You can not kill someone's family and expect to
be thanked for bringing freedom.
The truth is we were lied to about having any desire to free the people of Iraq.
That was a lie. A leader needs to admit when he is wrong. The honourable thing
to do is stop sending them to kill and be killed. Their deaths will continue
to be in vain.
How many more must die?
How many more must lose limbs?
How many more must kill?
The answer is none if you bring them home.
Top
British troops play a vital
military role supporting the American occupation of Iraq, their presence is not
just symbolic
by Andy Newman | 17.11.04
The United States has 140000 troops in Iraq, clearly insufficient
to control the situation. These American forces are already feeling the strain.
With well over 1000 dead, they have also suffered more than 4000 severely wounded
many with brain damage and often with multiple limb loss. By January 2004 there
had been at least 22 GI suicides in Iraq. The report of a US Army mental health
team that went to Iraq in the autumn of 2003 found that 52% of troops in Iraq
reported low or very low personal morale, and 70% reported low or very low unit
morale. A paper published in the New England Journal of Medicine reported 19.5
per cent of troops who served in Iraq had moderate or severe mental health problems.
If milder symptoms such as anxiety are included, the number rises to 27.9 per
cent.
A high proportion of the US army in Iraq are from the reserves and the National
Guard; part time soldiers who did not expect a long tour overseas. Significantly
there are 5570 American troops in Iraq over the age of 50, and by July there
had been 10 deaths of these older soldiers, including 59 year old Staff Sgt William
D Chaney who was serving as a machine gun operator in a Black Hawk; the same
role he played in Vietnam.
The casualties and the trauma in Iraq alongside the long tours of duty expected
mean that the National Guard failed to meet its recruitment target by 10% this
year (a 5000 shortfall) - the first shortfall since 1994. Normally the US army
commits troops to 6 month tours overseas, but last year this was increased to
12 months for Iraq and Afghanistan due to the shortage of troops. "All the
Army leadership agrees that 12 months is too long," said Lt. Gen. H. Steven
Blum, chief of the National Guard Bureau, quoted in the Denver Post.
The numbers had been originally swelled by a further 22000 soldiers from 32 other
nations. But over the past few months most of these countries have announced
either complete withdrawal or leaving only a token number (for example just 12
soldiers from Moldova).
At the end of October, Hungary announced withdrawal of its 300 troops from Iraq,
on the same day Bulgaria said it was scaling back its own troop levels. Spain's
government pulled out 1,300 troops in March, following the election defeat of
pro-war Prime Minister Jos? Mar?a Aznar. The Dominican Republic withdrew 302
soldiers, Nicaragua 115 and Honduras 370. The Philippines withdrew its 51 in
July, a month early, after the resistance took hostage a civilian Filipino truck
driver. Norway has withdrawn 155 military engineers, keeping only 15 training
staff. Poland, the fourth-largest contributor, with 2,400 troops, says it intends
to withdraw by the end of 2005, and the Netherlands, with 1,400 troops, said
recently that the latest rotation of troops would be its last contribution to
Iraq.
The only remaining significant allies are Britain, with 12,000 troops, and Italy,
with more than 3,100. Of these forces only the British can be expected to be
effective in combat operations. But the wide questioning of the legitimacy of
the invasion and occupation of Iraq is also having an effect on the British army.
While waiting to be deployed to Camp Dogwood on 28th October, Ben Brereton, a
19-year-old craftsman in the Royal Electrical and Mechanical Engineers spoke
to the press: "I feel angry and wonder why we are going there". Private
Manny Lynch, 19, from the Black Watch, said: "I'm nervous and angry ...
We have heard a lot about the 'Triangle of Death', which makes everyone nervous
because it seems much worse up there than it has been down here. We have controlled
the situation down here while the Americans seemed to have ruined it up there." The
following day, Adam Ingram the Armed Forces minister reissued orders to troops
reinforcing the message that t hey could not speak to the media without prior
authorization.
The British Army is simply not big enough to sustain a long commitment to Iraq
if it endures significant causalities. The whispering doubts expressed about
the war from senior officers are motivated because they know that being sucked
in deeper endangers the long term effectiveness and independence of the British
armed forces.
The concentration of the Iraqi resistance on targeting Iraqi police and army
units has been strategically astute, understanding that these are the weak link
in the chain for the occupation. There is a real danger that they may prioritise
the targeting of British troops for similar reasons. Deployment of the Black
Watch to Camp Dogwood by Tony Blair significantly increases the danger not just
for the troops moved there, but for all British service men and women in Iraq.
A distant hope for the American Army is to shift more of the burden of fighting
onto their Iraqi allies. The United States have spent $1.2 billion in developing
Iraq's security forces, which now number around 220,000. The Iraqi units include
the military, police and Interior Ministry forces. However when ordered to prepare
for the recent offensive against the Mahdi Army in Najaf, Iraqi Interior Ministry
troops suffered a desertion rate that exceeded 80 percent. During the recent
assault on Fallujah the New York Times reported 500 Iraqi troops refusing to
fight. The US Government Accounting Office reports: "Effective Iraqi security
forces are critical for transitioning security responsibilities to Iraq ... However,
Iraqi security forces proved unready to take over security responsibilities from
the multinational force, as demonstrated by their collapse during April 2004." The
recent arrest of General Talib al-Lahibi, for collaborating with the resistance
casts f urther doubt on the reliability of the Iraqi army. Gen Lahibi was in
charge of security for Diyala province north-east of Baghdad. He commanded three
battalions in the area of the new pro-American army.
Iraq is locked into a cycle of violence, where every attempt by the occupation
forces to crush the resistance will create more resentment, more Iraqi families
with bereaved relatives, and more reasons for people to join a growing resistance.
The American Army and Marines do not have sufficient force to fight that war
alone, and they will look to their loyal ally Tony Blair to plug the gap. They
have no other friends to turn to.
Andy Newman
Swindon Stop the War Coalition
Top
From the mother of Dante Zappala
and Sgt. Sherwood Baker
by Celeste Zappala | 12.11.04
Dear Friends, I am the mother of Dante Zappala and Sgt. Sherwood
Baker. Dante returned tonight and showed us your pictures, shared your words
and thoughts with us, and now I consider you all as my friends. We are bound
in a sad fellowship of loss as well as a mission to do everything we can to stop
this disastrous war. This hideous force that is moving through Iraq, and Britain,
Scotland, Wales, the US and scores of other nations- creating grief, destruction
and death. And we the saddest witnesses must help each other to stand against
it. I pray for you all, carry your names and your children's names in my heart,
and send you my love.
Peace be with you,
Celeste Zappala Philadelphia,
PA USA, mother of Sgt Sherwood Baker, killed in Baghdad - 04/26/04
Top
Greetings from Military Families
Speak Out in the U.S.
by Nancy Lessin and Charley Richardson |12.11.04
Dear Military Families Against the War, On behalf of over
1,900 military families in the United States who are members of Military Families
Speak Out -- who have been speaking out against the war in Iraq, a war based
on lies that our relatives and loves ones have been deployed to, fought in, may
be deployed to, or have died in -- we extend our warmest greetings to you.
We are so glad that Military Families Speak Out member Dante Zappala was able
to be with you for your founding events. As you may know, Military Families Speak
Out (MFSO) began two years ago this month, with two military families speaking
out to try to prevent an invasion of Iraq. We are now almost 2,000 families,
with new families joining every day. There are now members of MFSO in every state
(all 50) across our country. We also have members in Puerto Rico, Germany and
several other countries, whose loved ones are members of the U.S. military.
We look forward to working together and building the voice of military families
in both of our countries to put an end to this illegal and immoral war. We will
share your website with all of our members and have linked your site on our website
which is www.mfso.org Thank you for your strength, your courage and your compassion.
Yours is a most welcome voice in this time of such troubles!
In Peace and Solidarity, Nancy Lessin and Charley Richardson Co-founders,
Military Families Speak Out
website: www.mfso.org
email: mfso@mfso.org
Bring Them Home NOW campaign website: www.bringthemhomenow.org
Top
Letter
To Mr Blair
by Military Families Against the War | 10.11.04
Dear Mr Blair,
We present ourselves here today to pay our respects and remember the courageous
soldiers who have made the ultimate sacrifice in the service of their country
in Iraq. Also to voice our support to the brave personnel currently involved
in operations in Iraq who are dedicated to doing their duty. We feel that the
most effective way of showing our support is to influence a prompt, safe return
with the dignity and respect they so rightly deserve.
When enlisting, service men and women sign an ´Oath of Allegiance° to her Majesty°s
Government. All these people ask in return is that their Government act in an
honourable, truthful and responsible manner and only deploy troops into the theatre
of war to risk their lives when absolutely necessary when all avenues of diplomacy
have been exhausted. To deploy these troops based on deceit of WMD is totally
morally unacceptable. The blame lies firmly at your doorstep. This was a contrived
war, a war of option not necessity.
Where is the accountability Mr Blair for the 74 British servicemen killed, several
injured and over 100,000 innocent Iraqi victims, men, women and children dead?
Where is the apology you said you can give? You have not said sorry to one single
family.
How Mr Blair can you walk through all this human carnage with impunity? We now
form part of a campaign with the support of many MPs dedicated to bringing you
to account. We will not go away! The possibilities and feasibility of 'impeachment'
are
currently being explored.
The document 'A Case to Answer' has been presented to you with 28 specific questions
and in your arrogance you have not afforded the common courtesy of a response
or acknowledgement.
As Iraq contains the second largest oil reserves in the world and could not fulfil
its oil production potential due to crippling sanctions it was viewed as an easy
target for Western interests to plunder its mineral wealth. It would appear multi-million
dollar contracts were already being negotiated before the war to extract oil
and rebuild infrastructure.
Please remember Mr Blair: no capability of a 45-minute deployment of WMD, no
stockpiles of WMD, no WMD programmes, no links with Al Q'aeda and no links with
9/11. Without the above how could Iraq form part of the so-called 'axis of evil'?
What therefore was Iraq's crime to warrant an illegal invasion without United
Nations support? If you are so keen on enforcing democracy Mr Blair, why do you
not enforce it on strong countries capable of 'biting back', not one that has
been weakened by years of sanctions.
You have now changed the rhetoric for your remit for war from WMD to regime change.
Kofi Annan, UN Secretary General, states that this is illegal. Thus you are forcing
our troops to engage in an illegal conflict against Iraq that you and Mr Bush
presumed to be a soft target. The resulting chaos and atrocities are now played
out for all to see daily on our television screens. The world is now undeniably
a more dangerous place.
Stop the war, bring the troops home and hand responsibility over to the United
Nations. At least Kofi Annan still retains some integrity and has a proven unbiased
diplomatic record.
Why Mr Blair as the deceased are being repatriated do you find it necessary to
continue this unhealthy liaison with Mr Bush? Is it to receive a pat on the back
for moving the Black Watch into the Triangle of Death so as to be seen to have
supported Mr Bush's re-election campaign?
On a closing note, Geoff Hoon addressed the House and stated the risks moving
the Black Watch were acceptable. Yet within days we have 5 killed and several
seriously injured. How is this justifiable?
Well Mr Blair you have been true to your word on one point. You are getting some
of the Black Watch home for Christmas, tragically injured, maimed and others
in body bags.
Morally unacceptable conduct of a British Prime Minister in the 21st
Century!
Signed:
Rose Gentle
Reg Keys
Caroline Harrison
Selma Zappala
Dante Zappala
Christine Robinson
Leslie Robinson
Theresa Evans
Robbie Buckland
James Buchanan
Top
An Open Letter
to Military Families in
the UK
By Dante Zappala | 09.11.04
My name is Dante Zappala. I am an American. I know first hand the consequences
of the lies told to justify the war in Iraq. My brother was a soldier in the
US Army. He was killed working for the Iraq Survey Group while they looked for
Weapons of Mass Destruction. My sadness has led me to search for truth. That
search has, at times, seemed hopeless. Yet, in the wake of our disastrous election,
I find myself in the UK.
I have been meeting with military families who share an experience similar to
mine. My hope is that those of you who share our belief-that this is an unjust
war based on lies-will mobilize to pressure your government to withdrawal British
troops. I am a member of Military Families Speak Out, an organization of over
1800 families in the US. We are comprised of people with relatives or loved ones
who are involved with the Iraq war. We are a politically, ethnically, religiously
and economically diverse group of families. But we share one common cause: Bring
our troops home now!
Most of our members never saw themselves as 'political' but saw the need to speak
against an injustice that affected them so personally. In the end, the people
we love suffer at the hands of those who lead us recklessly into war. The children
of George Bush and Tony Blair do not walk in the desert under the threat of death.
Yet that is exactly what they expect of our sons, daughters, brothers, sisters,
mothers and fathers.
There are numerous families in the UK who have been dramatically affected by
the decision of Tony Blair to follow George Bush into Iraq. Rose Gentle and Reg
Keys both lost their sons to this bloody conflict. They want to know why. Along
with several others, they have formed Military Families Against the War.
I urge you to join as well.
The voice of Military Families is a brave voice of unquestionable patriotism.
Our most valued assets are at risk and it is imperative that we be heard.
Our family members take an oath to serve. They promise to protect us against
enemies and are willing to die in the process. Their nobility was shamelessly
compromised when Tony Blair signed them on to the American agenda.
You have a legitimate opportunity to do what we in the States could not - hold
those responsible for this tragedy accountable. I was in London when the news
hit that three Black Watch soldiers were killed. I could sense the outrage. And
in only a few days, another has died. When will it end?
Now is the time to ensure that no other brave soldiers are made to suffer the
same consequence. Please join with Rose, Reg and the rest to insist that British
Soldiers be removed from Iraq.
With Hope,
Dante Zappala
Top
Letter to Tony Blair
By Maxine Gentle | 19.08.04
To Prime Minister Tony Blair,
My name is Maxine Gentle and I am 14 years old.
I am the sister of Fusilier Gordon Gentle who died in the war in Iraq on the
28th June 2004.
I want my thoughts and feelings to be heard and known.
My feelings are that I think you are rubbish at your job. You don't care about
the British public, armed forces or anyone in fact.
My big brother died at the age of 19, and what for?
A war over oil and money, that's what I think the war is all about. There was
no such thing as weapons of "mass destruction", if there were Saddam
Hussein would have used them at the start of the war.
I think that you should withdraw all of our soldiers from Iraq. After all, it
is not our war, it's America's. So why did we, the British, have to get involved?
I think that you just don't want to get on the wrong side of George Bush.
My big brother meant the world to me. I looked up to him with pride because he
made something of himself.
He was well known, just like you, but everyone liked and loved him, not like
you, because I have no respect for you, and nor do a lot of other people I know.
Gordon had only passed out in April, and yet by May YOU sent him and many others
to a war zone.
What I find strange is that in order to be a qualified plumber or electrician
you need to train for 3 or 4 years, but to be a qualified soldier, and learn
to KILL someone, you only need to train for SIX MONTHS!
The people that you have sent out there are still young; they have the rest of
their lives to live, just like Gordon did.
My family is still hurting badly and so am I. To you he was just another number
clown.
From the minute that we found out Gordon was going over there we were all worried
about him, right up until the minute we found out it was Gordon that was killed
by the Iraqis.
We are all hurting badly, but I don't just blame Gordon's death on the Iraqis
that made the roadside bomb, I blame YOU as well because it is your fault that
our soldiers are over there in the first place, by agreeing with George Bush
that we HAD to go to war, when we didn't!
As I said everyone is hurting badly right now, but you would not know that because
your sons are all tucked up nicely in bed at night, at the same time as there
are mums and dads who still have sons over there, who can't sleep at night, wondering
if their loved ones are coming home or are they going to be the next ones to
be killed.
You would not know how we all feel, because you're at home at night with your
wife and son watching them growing up, but we will never know what Gordon would
have been like in years to come.
It is okay for you sitting there with all your money and power, ruining people's
lives by the decisions YOU make.
I don't care who knows how I feel about you. All you care about is things that
benefit you. All you and your new "best Friend" George Bush care about
is Iraq's oil.
My big brother died in the early hours of the morning, and yet, when you and
George Bush went on live TV in the afternoon to hand the country back over, you
both stood there that afternoon smiling and acting like one big happy family
when you both knew well that a British soldier had died that morning.
Nothing you can do or say will change my mind, or the fact that I am hurting
badly inside.
I cry myself to sleep most of the time because Gordon has gone and is never coming
back.
Quite frankly I would have loved to meet you myself and tell you all this personally.
But if I met you I would not shake your hand.
This is my personal feelings towards you and George Bush, but I have less respect
for you than him because YOU are the British Prime Minister, well supposed to
be, and I am British, although sometimes I am ashamed to admit to being British
when I have got such a bad prime minister as you.
I hope you have pleasure reading this as I have had pleasure writing it.
Yours Sincerely
Maxine Gentle
Top
|