|
From
the family of Malcolm Kendall-Smith
It is astounding to think that in 2006, in a democratic society,
an Assistant Judge Advocate - Jack Bayliss - could have the arrogance
to deprive a person of the right to a fair trial. The gagging order
brought down prior to the GCM disallowed the defendant's honestly
held belief, and deeply researched defence, to be heard.
The severity of the sentence was disproportionate to the action taken
by the defendant, and in the fullness of time may well prove to be
the undoing of both the representives of the tribunal and of the persons
responsible for taking your country into Iraq without the necessary
mandate from the UN. The revealed documents relating to the original
advice from the Attorney General at the time of the invasion, had
every relevance to the defence, and yet were seen to be irrelevant
by the same Jack Bayliss. Throughout the entire proceeding he demonstrated
a bullying attitude which seemed to come from a fear of being challenged
in any way. It is questionable whether this person was appropriate
to facilitate such a court.
As families of those serving in the Armed Forces we all understand
the risks associated with their work. This we can accept. However,
there are times when it becomes apparent that these people are placed
in situations not in accordance with international law. The real humanitarians
are those who challenge such situations in order to save unnecessary
loss.
Our family joins in thanking all those who are showing their support
for Malcolm. It is greatly appreciated.
Our best wishes to you all
Margaret and Ian Kendall-Smith |
|
|